About Me

Dr. J. (James) Alva Scruggs received a B. S. degree in Chemistry from Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, M. S. in Chemistry from Southern Connecticut State University, M. A./ Degree in Urban Studies from Occidental College, and a Doctorate in Education Administration from the University of Massachusetts.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

ROMNEY’S THOUGHTS ON SANDY AND OTHER NATIONAL DISASTERS !!


 

ROMNEY’S THOUGHTS ON SANDY AND OTHER NATIONAL DISASTERS !!

(Unedited/Unabridged 2012)

 

Romney is right up front with his cold, calculating, inhumane, monetary, distorted views of human society. In his attempt to show his “feeling” for the American citizens caught in this latest natural disaster, “hurricane Sandy, ” he said that this disaster should be taken care of by the responsibility of Private Benevolence, capitalist for profit. In other words Romney would have all national disasters be under the efforts and profits (on a cost ($) plus basis) of the Capitalist Industry. This is to say that disasters as Hurricanes, tornados, floods, earth quakes, tidal waves, raging fires of forest and housing should not be handled by FEMA as a responsibility of the Federal Government. It should be the opportunity of “private for profit industry.” Some of this is already true.

Look at the way the US is using the mercenary corporation of Black Water to fight wars and the use of Halliburton Corporation to supply the logistics, materials and supplies!!

            Yes,Romney sees national chaos and disasters as the ripe opportunity to make profits. Romney is looking forward to “climate change for the disasters it will bring!  Romney said recently in “quite places” that, “The Federal Government should not handle anything that private industry could do for profit, and that all national growth and maintenance should be done by private business (including social security, medical, wars, education, curebcy oriting and distribution, etc)!!”

 

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs, BS, MS, MA, EdD
Look Forward to Your Comments
E-MAIL
JSCRU5750 (at) AOL.COM

Blog: http://franklyspeaking.info.blogspot.com
Website ;
http://franklyspeaking.info

 

 

 

Friday, October 26, 2012

A Canadian View Of Our Politics


Subject: FW: A Canadian View Of Our Politics
We have to go outside of our own borders to get an honest editorial! How sad!

A Canadian View Of Our Politics
From Canada ~ A MUST READ!!!

Check out this article from Canada :
http://www.seniorlivingmag.com/articles/america-hes-your-president-for-goodness-sake
America - He's your President for Goodness Sake!By William Thomas

There was a time not so long ago when Americans, regardless of their political stripes,
rallied round their president. Once elected, the man who won the White House was
no longer viewed as a Republican or Democrat, but the President of the United States.
The oath of office was taken, the wagons were circled around the country€and it’s
borders and it was America versus the rest of the world with the president of all the
people at the helm.

Suddenly President Barack Obama, with the potential to become an exceptional
president has become the glaring exception to that unwritten, patriotic rule.

Four days before President Obama’s inauguration, before he officially took charge of
the American government, Rush Limbaugh boasted publicly that he hoped the president
would fail. Of course, when the president fails the country flounders.

Wishing harm upon your country in order to further your own narrow political views
is selfish, sinister and a tad treasonous as well.

Subsequently, during his State of the Union address, which is pretty much a pep rally
for America, an unknown congressional representative from South Carolina, later
identified as Joe Wilson, stopped the show when he called the President of the United
States a liar. The president showed great restraint in ignoring this unprecedented insult
and carried on with his speech.Speaker Nancy Pelosi was so stunned by the slur, she
forgot to jump to her feet while clapping wildly, 30 or 40 times after that.

Last spring, President Obama took his wife Michelle to see a play in New York City
and republicans attacked him over the cost of security for the excursion. The president
cannot take his wife out to dinner and a show without being scrutinized by the political
opposition? As history has proven, a president in a theatre without adequate security
is a tragically bad idea.Remember: Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy
the play?

At some point, the treatment of President Obama went from offensive to ugly and then
to downright dangerous.

The health-care debate, which looked more like extreme fighting in a mud pit
than a national dialogue, revealed a very vulgar side of America . President Obama’s
face appeared on protest signs white-faced and blood-mouthed in a satanic clown
image. In other tasteless portrayals, people who disagreed with his position distorted
his face to look like Hitler complete with mustache and swastika.

Odd, that burning the flag makes Americans crazy, but depicting the president as a
clown and a maniacal fascist is accepted as part of the new rude America .

Maligning the image of the leader of the free world is one thing, putting the president's
life in peril is quite another. More than once, men with guns were videotaped at the
health-care rallies where the president spoke. Again, history shows that letting men
with guns get within range of a president has not served America well in the past.

And still the birther’s out there claiming Barack Obama was not born in the United
States, although public documentation proves otherwise. Hawaii is definitely part of
the United States, but the Panama Canal Zone where his electoral opponent Senator
John McCain was born? Nobody cares.

Last month, a 44-year-old woman in Buffalo was quite taken by President Obama
when she met him in a chicken wing restaurant called Duff’s. Did she say something
about a pleasure and an honor to meet the man or utter encouraging words for the
difficult job he is doing? No. Quote: You're a hottie with a smoking little body.

Lady, that was the President of the United States you were addressing, not one of the
Jonas Brothers! He’s your president for goodness sakes, not the guy driving the
Zamboni at Monster Trucks On Ice. Maybe next it'll be, Take Your President To A
Topless Bar Day.

In President Barack Obama, Americans have a charismatic leader with a good and
honest heart. Unlike his predecessor, he’s a very intelligent leader. And unlike that
president’s predecessor, he’s a highly moral man.

In President Obama, Americans have the real deal, the whole package and a leader
that citizens of almost every country around the world look to with great envy. Given
the opportunity, Canadians would trade our leader, hell, most of our leaders for Obama
in a heartbeat.

What America has in Obama is a head of state with vitality and insight and youth. Think
about it, Barack Obama is a young Nelson Mandela. Mandela was the face of change
and charity for all of Africa but he was too old to make it happen. The great things
Obama might do for America and the world could go on for decades after he’s out of
office. America, you know not what you have.

The man is being challenged unfairly, characterized with vulgarity and treated with the
kind of deep disrespect to which no previous president was subjected. It’s like the day
after electing the first black man to be president, thereby electrifying the world with hope
and joy, Americans sobered up and decided the bad old days were better.

President Obama may fail but it will not be a Richard Nixon default fraught with larceny
and lies. President Obama, given a fair chance, will surely succeed but his triumph will
never come with a Bill Clinton caveat if only he'd got control of that zipper.

Please. Give the man a fair, fighting chance. This incivility toward the leader who won over
Americans and gave hope to billions of people around the world that their lives could be
enhanced by his example, just naturally has to stop.

Believe me, when Americans drive by the White House and see a sign on the lawn that reads:
No shirt. No shoes. No service, they'll realize this new mindless national rudeness has gone
way, way too far. And I may realise, sooner rather than later,that I've just wasted my time
writing this.


Ah America - Canada, Leave her to heaven!













































Thursday, October 18, 2012

Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney made at least $15 million on the auto bailout

AMY GOODMAN: we turn to a major new exposé on the cover of The Nation magazine called "Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza: How He Made Millions from the Rescue of Detroit. " Investigative reporter Greg Palast reveals how Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney made at least $15 million on the auto bailout and that three of Romney’s top donors made more than $4 billion for their hedge funds from the bailout. Greg Palast, welcome back to Democracy Now! So, lay it out for us.
GREG PALAST: Oh, it’s one of the creepiest stories I’ve investigated in a long time, Amy. Mitt Romney, through Ann Romney’s blind trust—not so blind, they could see exactly where the money was going—gave their money to Paul "The Vulture" Singer, a guy you and I have been following on Democracy Now! for five years. Singer, with two of his hedge fund buddies, bought up the auto parts division of General Motors for only 67 cents a share. They were able to turn 67 cents a share into $22 a share by threatening GM and the U.S. Treasury with a complete shutdown of the auto industry. They had complete control of all the steering wheels and steering columns of every car that was being made in America. GM would have been liquidated. They literally threatened to shut down GM. And so, they—the government simply allowed GM to pay them $12 billion. About half of that was straight from the U.S. Treasury in a takeover of Delphi’s pension fund.
Once they got the money—once they got the money, they eliminated 28 of 29 auto plants in the U.S. They moved—they eliminated every single job of every UAWmember; 25,200 UAW members all lost their jobs. Almost every plant was then moved by the Romney group to China. Delphi is making a fortune today. So you have 25,000 workers who lost their jobs to China. Three hedge fund managers made at least $4 billion, $4.2 billion. And the Romneys have made at least 15, but the evidence suggests that it’s more like $115 million for the Romneys, about a 4,000 percent profit.
What we can’t get from them at this moment, this may be the reason why they are not releasing their 2009 taxes, because that would give us a better hint. Unfortunately, they’ve not only moved the company operations to China, but they’ve moved their incorporation of the auto parts division of General Motors from Troy, Michigan, to the Isle of Jersey in the Mediterranean Sea, which hides their taxes and also, of course, hides their accounts. So that—that’s the story.
AMY GOODMAN: Greg, how did you get this information?
GREG PALAST: Well, I’ve been, you know, tracking Paul "The Vulture" Singer and his hedge fund for five years, as you saw, for Democracy Now! , from the Congo to England to South America. And I was stunned, absolutely stunned, to find out that the Romneys had given what ABC called a vast chunk of their money to Elliott Management. But it was well hidden. It not only went through Ann Romney’s blind trust, but then the blind trust was put in a special limited liability partnership with Paul Singer, which they then hid their levels of investments. Plus, by putting it in Ann Romney’s name—and remember, every dime that Ann Romney has comes from her husband—by Mitt moving his money to Ann Romney, they didn’t have to declare exactly how much money they made here, only that it was more than a million. But we were able to calculate that it was at least $15 million, and more likely $115 million.

Thursday, October 04, 2012

OBAMA MAY HAVE LOST THE FIRST DEBATE BUT HE HAS NOT LOST THE ELECTION!!


OBAMA MAY HAVE LOST THE FIRST DEBATE BUT HE HAS NOT LOST THE ELECTION!!

(Unedited/Unabridged 2011)



You are right!! Romney did pull off a better debate than Obama October 3, 2012. Obama came off as a typical “Colored Boy” of the South. When talking to his master. they could never, as rule. attack their white master. But the Black could be intelligent, sharp, polite, but subdued.

            As my football coach would say, “ the end game is what counts!” If Obama was setting Romney up for the kill his next debate must be an aggressive attack of this man, who would be President, as if he was a Red Headed stepchild. Obama must attack like “Bubber/President Clinton.” He must number the issues: 1. Repeal of Rove VS Wade, 2 Vouchers for Medical Care, 4. Job out-sourcing, 5. Privatizing Social Security, 6. Tax raises for the Middle Class to provide Tax relief for the wealthy, 7. War on Iran while his finger is on the Red nuclear Button, 8. Investments in renewable energy resources, 9.

            After Romney provides his spin and talking points to each of Obama's issuers without answering any questions, Obama must repeat the issues one by one all over again and remind Romney that he as President must participate in debates but the President is always the President and as such he must always talk and think as if his presentations were in the good of the people/nation!

            Further, it is time that the fact hat Americans realized that the Government is the people and that there is no separation of this Constitutional Provision-Government in American is a “Democratic Republic” run of, by, and for the people. Only American’s Private Institution of Capitalism is a functioning unit aside from the Government.

 

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs,  BS, MS, MA, EdD
Look Forward to Your Comments
E-MAIL
JSCRU5750 (at) AOL.COM

Blog:  http://franklyspeaking.info.blogspot.com
Website ;
http://franklyspeaking.info